http://zbowling.disqus.com/enTue, 02 Sep 2008 07:46:49 -0000http://zbowling.com/blog/2006/05/31/flash-libmozembed/#comment-2837034<p>I disagree <br>Can you give more info?</p>DerekTue, 02 Sep 2008 07:46:49 -0000http://zbowling.com/blog/2006/05/31/flash-libmozembed/#comment-2837033<p>true. i guess we can cross that bridge when we came to it.</p>zbowlingThu, 01 Jun 2006 13:32:12 -0000http://zbowling.com/blog/2006/05/31/flash-libmozembed/#comment-2837032<p>Not sure, but can\'t you access the html code and run javascript? If so you can easly check the browser and version creating a custom page and invoking a javascript inside it.</p>AlexandreThu, 01 Jun 2006 09:05:17 -0000http://zbowling.com/blog/2006/05/31/flash-libmozembed/#comment-2837031<p>part of the problem is that microsoft's api doesn't expose the useragent as something in the api.</p>zbowlingThu, 01 Jun 2006 06:59:39 -0000http://zbowling.com/blog/2006/05/31/flash-libmozembed/#comment-2837030<p>How about exposing a property that exposes the UserAgent? That was the purpose wasn't it?</p>PhilippeThu, 01 Jun 2006 06:13:15 -0000http://zbowling.com/blog/2006/05/31/flash-libmozembed/#comment-2837029<p>thats a good question... one way would be via reflection into the inside the component to check to see if one my internal types exist. Its great but that would work without breaking ABI. I might be able to provide something else (maybe invoke something and getting a predicted variable back (like on init, the title tag will be "about:mozilla" until it chages pages unlike IE, which defaults to "about:blank").</p>zbowlingThu, 01 Jun 2006 04:37:51 -0000http://zbowling.com/blog/2006/05/31/flash-libmozembed/#comment-2837028<p>Wonderful work! BTW, how will we distinguish the moz version from the ie version?</p>anonymonoThu, 01 Jun 2006 03:16:23 -0000